KarmaTufte KarmaTufte

12-05-2015
History

Answered

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

Answer :

HistoryGuy HistoryGuy

14-05-2015

In general, secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide, and to engage with, other perspectives about a primary source or a certain historical event.

Answer Link

yarelllll yarelllll

06-10-2020

Answer:

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.

Explanation: took the test

Answer Link

Other Questions

what are 5 interesting facts about the west region

the sum of two numbers is 9 if one number is subtracted from the other the result is 3 find the numbers

The English established their first enduring colonial settlement in North America in A Raleigh North Carolina B Philadelphia Pennsylvania C Plymouth Massachuset

What is a planets period of rotation A the shape of its orbit B its tilt relative to the sun C one complete spin on its axis D one complete orbit around the sun

Is three forths bigger than four fifths

Which was a lasting impact of the US Constitution Points 5

The intensity of a radio signal from the radio station varies inversely as the square of the distance from the station Suppose intensity is 8000 units at a dist

if the revcesive allele fir cystic fibrosis is represented as c classify the following genotypes as homozygous dominant homozygous recessiveor carriersCC Cc cc

Which personal pronoun agrees with the antecedent Justine must turn in permission slip by Tuesday A hers B your C her D their

Which of the following correctly compares capitalism socialism and communism Capitalism values society collectively while socialism and communism value the mark